'Klopp not sure there is a player for Liverpool', says Markus Babbel
The former Reds defender sees no reason to sign another striker for the sake of it as big-money deals by rivals are speculated onIbrahima Konate has already been added to the ranks at Anfield, with a £36 million ($50m) deal done for the French defender, but there has been no more movement on Merseyside.
© Provided by Daily Mail MailOnline logo
Unesco is preparing to strip Liverpool of its World Heritage status in a secret ballot among members in China today after the UN body found the Government had failed to protect the site's 'authenticity and integrity'.
Officials at the heritage committee will decide whether the city's historic waterfront should lose the status it shares with Venice and the Taj Mahal in India, with a report recommending deletion from the list.
Liverpool's waterfront was named a World Heritage Site in 2004, joining places including Egypt's Pyramids and Canterbury Cathedral. But in 2012 it was placed on the Unesco's so-called 'danger list' - which also features sites in Iraq, Syria and Palestine - after the £5billion Liverpool Waters project to restore the northern docks was approved in 2013.
The "very bad" perspectives for the Great Coral Barrier
© Copyright 2021, the Obs the prospects of the future remain "very bad" for the great barrier of coral, and that even if this unique ecosystem seems Being somewhat reinstated over the past year, Monday 19 July of the Australian government scientists, when UNESCO has to decide on its status on the World Heritage List.
In an earlier report, the body also said that planning approval for Everton's proposed stadium at Bramley Moore Dock had added to the 'ascertained threat' to the waterfront's 'outstanding universal value' and signals a 'lack of commitment' to 'protect the property in the long-term'.
At Monday's session, delegates from Norway proposed the decision to be made via secret ballot and the move was supported by those representing Guatemala and Uganda. If two thirds of delegates vote to approve the decision, the city will be stripped of its status. © Provided by Daily Mail (
History of Liverpool's World Heritage site
The Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City is a Unesco designated World Heritage Site in Liverpool comprising of six locations in the city centre.
UNESCO removes DR Congo park from endangered list
The Democratic Republic of Congo scored a key heritage victory on Monday as UNESCO removed one of its nature reserves from a list of threatened sites, the UN agency said. UNESCO praised the country's conservation efforts and the government's commitment to ban prospecting for oil in Salonga, the vast central African country's largest public park. The World Heritage Committee cited "improvements towards its conservation state" in its decision,UNESCO praised the country's conservation efforts and the government's commitment to ban prospecting for oil in Salonga, the vast central African country's largest public park.
It includes the Pier Head, Albert Dock and William Brown Street as well as other city landmarks.
Unesco received the city council's nomination for the six sites in January 2003 and in September of that year sent International Council of Monuments and Statues representatives to carry out an evaluation on the eligibility for these areas to be given World Heritage Status.
In March 2004 ICOMOS recommended that Unesco inscribe the Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City as a World Heritage Site.
In 2012, the site was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger due to the proposed construction of Liverpool Waters project.
In July 2017, Unesco warned that the city's status as a World Heritage Site was at risk of being rescinded in light of planning and development proposals.
English Heritage asserted that the proposed Liverpool Waters development would leave the setting of some of Liverpool's most significant historic buildings 'severely compromised', the archaeological remains of parts of the historic docks 'at risk of destruction', and 'the city's historic urban landscape ... permanently unbalanced'.
Australia set to delay UNESCO ‘in danger' ruling for Great Barrier Reef
Australia has won enough international to avoid UNESCO listing the Great Barrier Reef as an "in danger" World Heritage Site ahead of a vote later this week.Australia has gained enough international support to avoid UNESCO listing the Great Barrier Reef as an "in danger" World Heritage Site, with 13 countries supporting its move to delay the decision until 2023.
A debate on the decision began on Sunday, but the nations were unable to reach a consensus on the issues.
Opening the meeting on Monday, chairman of the World Heritage Committee Tian Xuejun said: 'We heard extensive, in-depth discussions and a number of committee members have expressed diverging views.'
Delegates from Hungary suggested the decision be adjourned to the 2022 session, but representatives from countries including China and Bahrain disagreed. Participating countries will send representatives to the Unesco headquarters in Paris on Wednesday morning to cast their votes, and a decision will be announced shortly after.
A report by Liverpool City Council said £700million had been invested in upgrading historic assets within the site in the past few years, and a further £800million was due to be spent in the next five years, including on Everton's move from Goodison Park to the dock area.
Plans for the £500million stadium were approved earlier this year despite objections from heritage body Icomos, acting on behalf of Unesco, as well as the Victorian Society and Historic England.
Great Barrier Reef avoids 'in danger' tag after Australian government lobbying convinces UNESCO
The Great Barrier Reef will not be added to UNESCO's "in danger" list this year, after environment minister Sussan Ley's whirlwind diplomatic effort won enough support to override the UN body's scientific advisers.The final motion, passed by the World Heritage Committee on Friday night, asked Australia to deliver an updated report on the state of the reef in February 2022, which would be considered at a meeting later that year.
Leaders in Liverpool had called for Unesco to defer the decision so the committee could visit the city.
However, a draft decision notice seen by the i newspaper says that the Unesco committee 'notes with deep regret' that 'inadequate governance processes, mechanisms and regulations' have resulted in a 'significant loss' to the 'authenticity and integrity' of the site.
The committee adds that 'the process of further deterioration is irreversible' and the Government has 'not fulfilled its obligations' to 'protect and conserve' Liverpool's heritage under the UN convention about the site.
A report said: 'The approved planning application for a new football stadium in Bramley-Moore Dock within the property adds to the ascertained threat on the property's outstanding universal value (OUV) and is directly contrary to the approach requested by the committee for this property.'
In its latest report, the committee said: 'The UK Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government reviewed and approved the project.
'The state party has not complied with the repeated requests of the committee and has itself indicated that there are no legal and other means available in the governance of the property that would allow the state party to comply with all of the committee's requests so as to ensure the protection of the property.'
Late own goal gives Liverpool win against Mainz
A late own goal gave Liverpool a 1-0 win over Bundesliga side Mainz in their first full pre-season game in Austria. Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain missed the best chance of the first half, seeing his effort in the box saved well by Robin Zentner, before Liverpool changed all 11 players at half-time at the Goldberg Stadium in Grodig.
© Provided by Daily Mail (
Damian Moore, MP for Southport, told MailOnline it would be 'disappointing' and a 'great shame' if Liverpool was to be removed from the list, but ultimately said redevelopment is important for the city.
Joanne Anderson, the mayor of Liverpool, said it would be 'hugely unfair' if it was decided the city was to be removed after a discussion during the meeting of the World Heritage Committee in late July.
'We think deletion would be hugely unfair given all this body of work has not yet been assessed by the committee members and we need them to see Bramley Moore Dock with their own eyes,' she said.
'Deletion would not just be a loss to Liverpool, the UK, and to a greater degree Unesco, it would be an even bigger missed opportunity in demonstrating to the world that heritage and regeneration are not mutually exclusive.'
Steve Rotheram, Liverpool City Region mayor, said the move was 'deeply disappointing', while heritage campaigner Wayne Colquhoun said city planners had 'pushed the boundaries' too far.
What makes a World Heritage Site?
There are ten key requirements an area must have to be considered for World Heritage Site status:
How can we end antiquities trafficking? .
The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the theft and trafficking of antiquities and historical manuscripts.Although the theft of antiquities has been a problem since antiquity itself, its pace has increased during the pandemic, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa – areas rich in heritage sites. As many societies remain in a forced standstill because of the pandemic, looters and smugglers are reducing ancient sites to rubble. The illegal digging for antiquities in Egypt alone more than doubled in 2020.