TOP News

Opinion: The Supreme Court Has Anointed Itself Czar of the Country’s COVID Rules

DNC Chairman Jaime Harrison slams Tom Cotton as a 'little maggot-infested man' after the Republican senator suggested Ketanji Brown Jackson would defend Nazis

  DNC Chairman Jaime Harrison slams Tom Cotton as a 'little maggot-infested man' after the Republican senator suggested Ketanji Brown Jackson would defend Nazis The top Democrat also called the GOP "a party built on fraud, fear, and fascism.""In a Senate where there is Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, Tom Cotton is the lowest of the low," Harrison said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe.

Much will be said about the implications of yesterday’s Supreme Court decision effectively blocking the Biden administration’s COVID-vaccine mandate for the 84 million workers affected, not to mention their families, and anyone they come in contact with. But as a matter of constitutional law, Justice Neil Gorsuch nailed the crucial issue in the opening line of his concurring opinion: “The central question we face today is: Who decides?”

  The Supreme Court Has Anointed Itself Czar of the Country’s COVID Rules © Getty ; The Atlantic

[Kimberly Wehle: The vaccine-mandate case is about so much more than vaccine mandates]

According to the Court’s conservative majority, the answer appears to be that the Supreme Court is the ultimate decider of all things—such that its unelected members can wipe out the actions of the democratically elected branches of government with the stroke of a pen.

Biden celebrates with Ketanji Brown Jackson after her Supreme Court confirmation: photos

  Biden celebrates with Ketanji Brown Jackson after her Supreme Court confirmation: photos White House photographers captured the moments before Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's historic Senate confirmation.Biden promised to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court during the 2020 campaign. Once Justice Stephen Breyer officially retires this summer, Jackson will be sworn in and become the nation's first Black woman to serve on the nation's highest court.

This is not how things are supposed to work.

There are four competing sources of governmental power when it comes to vaccine requirements.

First, there are the states, which traditionally enjoy what’s known as inherent “police power” to regulate health and safety. Police officers and sheriffs act at the state and local level, for example, pursuant to state and local legislation. The leading case on whether individuals have a constitutional right to reject vaccines, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, involved a state vaccine mandate—not a federal one. The Court held in 1905 that states could enact compulsory smallpox-vaccine requirements to protect public health, despite a plaintiff’s claim that a Massachusetts law violated his constitutional rights.

Ketanji Brown Jackson's historic Supreme Court confirmation receives a standing ovation, cheers and praise: 'This is a watershed moment'

  Ketanji Brown Jackson's historic Supreme Court confirmation receives a standing ovation, cheers and praise: 'This is a watershed moment' Sen. Cory Booker said he felt "immense pride and so much joy" after Thursday's bipartisan vote to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court. "This is a watershed moment," Rep. Joyce Beatty of Ohio said. Jackson was confirmed in a bipartisan vote, with three Republicans supporting her. The Senate chamber erupted with applause and cheers after Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman nominated for the Supreme Court, was confirmed in a bipartisan vote on Thursday.

Second, there’s Congress, which has the power to legislate—or, in other words, to create rules controlling private conduct—under Article I of the Constitution. Here, Congress used that power to pass the Occupational Safety and Health Act in order “to assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources.”

Third, there’s the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the federal agency that Congress created in the OSH Act. Congress gave OSHA the power to promulgate “mandatory occupational safety and health standards applicable to business affecting interstate commerce,” among other things. It also gave OSHA the power to issue an “emergency standard” if it determines that employees could be in “grave danger” of exposure to “substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful.” In Industrial Union Department v. American Petroleum Institution, the Supreme Court in 1979 fully recognized OSHA’s “broad authority … to promulgate different kinds of standards,” but held that before the agency can ban carcinogens, it must perform a cost-benefit analysis. It was through OSHA, which resides in the executive branch, that President Joe Biden issued the emergency standard that required mandatory COVID vaccines or tests in workplaces with 100 or more employees.

Senate confirms Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman nominated for the Supreme Court, in a bipartisan vote

  Senate confirms Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman nominated for the Supreme Court, in a bipartisan vote Three Republicans joined all Democrats in Thursday's historic confirmation vote for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson.The final tally was 53-47 for Jackson, President Joe Biden's first nominee to the Supreme Court. Three Republicans— Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Mitt Romney of Utah — broke with their party and joined all 50 Democrats in the historic vote, a showing of bipartisanship that has become increasingly rare for Supreme Court confirmations.

Fourth, there’s the Supreme Court, which held in 1803 that it alone—not the other two branches—has the power to declare laws unconstitutional and thereby annotate the Constitution itself.


Video: Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates face Supreme Court review (Yahoo! Finance)

So which governmental body gets to make the vaccine-mandate call on behalf of American workers—the states, Congress, OSHA, or the Supreme Court?

[Adam Serwer: The lie about the Supreme Court that everyone pretends to believe]

The majority in this week’s OSHA decision picked Congress, arguing that there’s no express mandate in the statute that created OSHA about vaccines, so the power to establish federal vaccine laws stays with Congress. Although OSHA can determine fire and sanitation requirements for employers, the Court reasoned, a vaccine “cannot be undone at the end of a workday,” so in the Court’s view, vaccines are a different animal than other workplace safety measures.

In his concurring opinion, (the majority’s decision was issued “per curiam,” meaning no single justice took credit for writing it), Gorsuch emphasized the role of “state and local governments across the country and the people’s elected representatives in Congress” in combatting the coronavirus. To his eye, “an administrative agency in Washington” cannot do what OSHA did—that is, lodge “a claim of power to resolve a question of vast national significance” where “Congress has nowhere clearly assigned so much power” to it.

Sen. Raphael Warnock penned a letter to his daughter after Kentaji Brown Jackson's confirmation: 'She is the first Supreme Court Justice who looks like you'

  Sen. Raphael Warnock penned a letter to his daughter after Kentaji Brown Jackson's confirmation: 'She is the first Supreme Court Justice who looks like you' "In our nation's history, she is the first Supreme Court Justice who looks like you — with hair like yours," the letter said.Biden is expected to make a final decision by the end of February to replace Breyer and has already begun to reach out to potential candidates, according to CNN.

Justice Stephen Breyer sided with OSHA in his dissent, which Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan also signed, observing that “the administrative agency charged with ensuring health and safety in workplaces did what Congress commanded it to do: It took action to address COVID-19’s continuing threat in those spaces.”

Each of these options—states, Congress, or OSHA—arguably sounds reasonable. The problem is that the Court didn’t acknowledge that in not choosing OSHA, it wasn’t actually choosing states or Congress. It picked itself. In doing so, the Court did not adhere to the confines of its own role under Article III to resolve “cases” and “controversies” between discrete parties. It instead carved out its very own exception to its very own ban on OSHA vaccine mandates, as follows: “Where the virus poses a special danger because of the particular features of an employee’s job or workplace, targeted regulations are plainly permissible. We do not doubt, for example, that OSHA could regulate researchers who work with the COVID-19 virus.”

This language smacks of legislating, not judging. As to what constitutes a “special danger,” “particular features,” or “targeted regulations” that would save an OSHA vaccine mandate from the Supreme Court’s wrath, it’s anyone’s guess. Congress didn’t use any of these phrases in the operative portion of the OSH Act.

Rep. Jim Clyburn says Hillary Clinton would've won in 2016 if Obama had nominated a Black woman to the Supreme Court

  Rep. Jim Clyburn says Hillary Clinton would've won in 2016 if Obama had nominated a Black woman to the Supreme Court Clyburn argued that a Black female judge being blocked by Senate Republicans would've increased enthusiasm for Clinton's candidacy among Black voters.While speaking with the newspaper, the South Carolina Democrat brought up Obama's nomination of now-Attorney General Merrick Garland for the vacancy that arose after the February 2016 death of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia.

The kicker is that the Supreme Court is actually the worst of the four options when it comes to creating the country’s vaccine policy. Regular people can’t file comments with the Court on a proposed ruling and thereby put their views before the decision maker, as it can when an agency finalizes a regulation after a process known as “notice and comment” decision making. Nor can voters lobby Supreme Court justices for favorable policies as they can, at least in theory, with elected members of Congress. Unlike with legislation, moreover, there’s no way for the regulated community or those affected to know whether these “lawmakers” in robes would condone a revised vaccine regulation, other than for OSHA to enact a new one and litigate it all the way to the top for a stamp of approval. When judges—rather than Congress or administrative agencies—task themselves with filling in the blanks inevitably left in legislation, the people have little guidance in the interim.

This is precisely why Breyer closed his opinion with the same question that opened Gorsuch’s: “Underlying everything else in this dispute is a single, simple question: Who decides how much protection, and of what kind, American workers need from COVID-19?”

The majority effectively answered this question by anointing itself in charge.

Breyer saw it that way too. And he didn’t like it: “And then, there is this Court. Its Members are elected by, and accountable to, no one. And we lack the background, competence, and expertise to assess workplace health and safety issues. When we are wise, we know enough to defer on matters like this one. When we are wise, we know not to displace the judgments of experts, acting within the sphere Congress marked out and under Presidential control, to deal with emergency conditions. Today, we are not wise.”

Welcome to the new America, friends. Where the new boss of all bosses is not a king, or a president, or even Congress. It’s five or more elite legal minds with more unaccountable power than anyone—and with very strong opinions about what the law should be.

Poll: Most Americans see politics over substance in Supreme Court confirmation process .
About a third of Americans say the current process of confirming nominees leads to better justices getting on to the Supreme Court, a new poll shows.With Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's historic confirmation in the books, a new poll suggests a majority of Americans are uncertain whether it's worth all the fuss.

See also