Politics: Fake cow account must go, Devin Nunes demands in letter to Democrat over Twitter taunts

House Democrat and Jonestown Survivor Calls Out GOP Congressman Over 'Cult' Reference

  House Democrat and Jonestown Survivor Calls Out GOP Congressman Over 'Cult' Reference Rep. Jackie Speier called Rep. Devin Nunes' comments relating the House Committee and the media to religious cults despicable. The congresswoman was shot five times during the 1978 Jonestown Massacre.The California congresswoman was addressing statements that Nunes made on Fox's The Ingraham Angleon Wednesday. Nunes described the impeachment committee using similar language used to describe cults. "So many millions of Americans' minds are poisoned," he said, adding: "There's a cult going on in the basement in a SCIF behind locked doors." He not only likened the impeachment committee to a religious sect, but also accused the press of being one too.

WASHINGTON — Rep. Devin Nunes’ attorney last month demanded that his 2018 Democratic political opponent pressure an anonymous social media writer to delete comments on Twitter that mock Republican Nunes “day and night.”

Devin Nunes wearing a suit and tie looking at the camera: Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) speaks at a news conference on July 24, 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C.© Stefani Reynolds/CNP/Zuma Press/TNS Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) speaks at a news conference on July 24, 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Janz, the Fresno County prosecutor who ran against Nunes in 2018, interpreted the Oct. 11 letter from Nunes’ attorney Steven Biss as a threat to sue him.

“This is the first step in a lawsuit, to send a demand letter like this,” Janz said.

Republicans attempt to move impeachment inquiry away from Trump

  Republicans attempt to move impeachment inquiry away from Trump A list of witnesses demanded Saturday fits a pattern for GOP lawmakers, who have focused heavily on pushing various conspiracy theories and attacking Democrats as unfairly partisan.The GOP demands were met with immediate skepticism from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), who warned against “sham investigations” of the Bidens and other issues in a clear signal that many of the witnesses were unlikely to be called.

Nunes in March filed a lawsuit in Virginia against Twitter, a Republican political strategist and two anonymous writers behind social media accounts known as Devin Nunes’ Cow and Devin Nunes’ Mom alleging they conspired to defame him during Nunes’ 2018 reelection campaign.

Nunes’ letter to Janz focuses on the anonymous account known as Devin Nunes’ Cow, which has almost 630,000 followers and frequently publishes appeals to support Nunes’ political opponents. Prior to Nunes’ lawsuit, it had about 1,000 followers.

Nunes and Biss, Nunes’ lawyer, make clear in the Oct. 11 letter that they believe Janz is either behind or controlling the anonymous author of Devin Nunes’ Cow.

“As you well know, for over two years, Mr. Nunes has been maliciously harassed, stalked, bullied online, threatened and egregiously defamed on Twitter by the user or users who post day and night, through the anonymous Twitter account, @DevinCow,” Biss wrote.

Nunes brands impeachment hearing 'low-rent, Ukrainian sequel' to Russia collusion

  Nunes brands impeachment hearing 'low-rent, Ukrainian sequel' to Russia collusion House Intelligence Committee ranking member Rep. Devin Nunes kicked off the first public hearing of the impeachment probe by dismissing the allegations against President Trump.Nunes addressed Wednesday's witnesses, Acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor and State Department official George Kent, stating that they are being used in a "televised theatrical performance staged by the Democrats," after accusing Democrats of selecting witnesses "deemed suitable for television" and auditioning them during the closed-door sessions at the beginning of the inquiry.

Biss demands that Janz get the author of the cow account to stop tweeting “false and defamatory statements” about Nunes, to retract those tweets, apologize to Nunes and his family and delete the account within a day of the public apology.

“You are legally, ethically and morally responsible to act now,” Biss writes.

Biss’ letter cites California state laws that forbid using electronic devices to harass someone in such a way that causes the victims to fear for their safety, as well as a federal law that forbids threatening government officials with physical harm.

In a response written to Biss from Janz’s lawyer, Andrew Harris Werbrock, Janz rejects Biss’ demands and accuses Nunes of trying to silence his critics and “punish his political opponents.”

Janz “does not control the account, or the content of its communications, and cannot cause it to issue a retraction or an apology, or to dissolve,” Werbrock wrote. “Second, even if he could cause the account to issue a retraction, he would not, as your letter does not state any valid basis for doing so.”

GOP Challenges Taylor Knowledge of Events: Impeachment Update

  GOP Challenges Taylor Knowledge of Events: Impeachment Update The first public hearing in the formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump began Wednesday, as the House Intelligence Committee heard testimony from two State Department officials. © Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg Adam Schiff and Devin Nunes wait for the start of an impeachment inquiry hearing in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Nov. 13, 2019. The committee, led by Chairman Adam Schiff, received testimony from William Taylor, the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, and George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of State in the European and Eurasian bureau.

Mari Harren, a spokeswoman for Janz, said Janz’s campaign is considering filing ethics complaints with the California and Virginia sate bar associations over the letter because Biss discusses alleged criminal conduct in the letter to the Democrat.

“It’s our understanding that this wouldn’t be Mr. Biss’ first ethics violation,” Harren said, referencing a yearlong suspension on Biss about a decade ago.

Biss did not respond to a request for comment.

Janz in January opened a voter rights organization called the Voter Protection Project. Janz in March announced that he would use the organization in part to raise money to help the anonymous writer behind Devin Nunes’ Cow pay legal fees.

The organization paid $3,000 to the Hawkins Law Firm in Virginia earlier this year, which spokesman Matt Liebman said was paid on behalf of legal services for the author of Devin Nunes’ Cow.

“I have always kept clear boundaries against physical threats and discussions of his wife or children,” the anonymous author told McClatchy. “I have often told The Herd that those things are off limits, as well as scolded many for stepping over the line.”

Day One of the Public Impeachment Hearings

  Day One of the Public Impeachment Hearings We provide context for some of the statements made at the first day of the public impeachment hearings. The post Day One of the Public Impeachment Hearings appeared first on FactCheck.org.

Janz said he knows the identity of the anonymous writer behind the cow account but denied having any control over the account. On Monday, Janz said he did not learn the identity of the writer until after Nunes filed the lawsuit.

Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, said Nunes’ request would likely fail in court.

“I’m not sure what the legal theory is, and in all seriousness, you can be aware of a fake Twitter account, but if you don’t control it, you have no legal authority over it,” she said.

She wrote an opinion article for NBC in September in which she said that Nunes’ lawsuit against Twitter raises fair questions about the responsibility of social media companies.

But, she said the request in the Janz letter had less merit. “This is just bizarre to basically say, ‘You need to tell your neighbor to stop talking so badly about me.’”

Nunes kept his congressional seat in 2018 by his narrowest margin of victory during his time in Congress, about 5 percentage points. Janz raised $9 million for the race and Nunes brought in $12 million.

Nunes’ fundraising has been even stronger in the 2020 cycle — he has about $7 million in cash on hand, according to the latest campaign finance report, and there’s another year to go.

If Nunes decided to sue Janz, it would be Nunes’ sixth lawsuit filed this year. In addition to the lawsuit against Twitter, he’s also suing McClatchy, the parent company of his hometown paper The Fresno Bee; political research firm Fusion GPS and progressive watchdog group Campaign for Accountability; and journalist Ryan Lizza, who last year reported that Nunes’ family farm had moved to Iowa.

He also sued a retired farmer from his southern San Joaquin Valley district and Democratic groups who unsuccessfully challenged Nunes’ designation as a farmer on the 2018 ballot. Nunes’ campaign dropped that lawsuit, filed in California, shortly after filing it.

———

©2019 McClatchy Washington Bureau

Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau at www.mcclatchydc.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Marie Yovanovitch, Ex-Ukraine Envoy Ousted by Trump, Says She Feels Intimidated by Him .
The former United States ambassador to Ukraine told the House impeachment inquiry on Friday that she felt threatened by President Trump and “shocked, appalled, devastated” that he insulted her in a call with another foreign leader, as Mr. Trump attacked her in real time on Twitter, drawing a stern warning about witness intimidation from Democrats. The extraordinary back-and-forth unfolded on the second day of public impeachment hearings, only the third in modern history, as Marie L. Yovanovitch, who was ousted as the envoy in Ukraine on Mr. Trump’s orders, offered damaging information about him to the House Intelligence Committee.

See also