Ex-NFL RB Clinton Portis Pleads Guilty in Health Care Fraud Scheme
Portis admitted to filing unlawful reimbursement claims to the league's program allowing former players to pursue funds for out-of-pocket medical care expenses that were not covered by insurance. View the original article to see embedded media.Former Washington Football Team and Broncos running back Clinton Portis plead guilty to conspiracy to committing health care fraud in a nationwide scheme that included more than a dozen former NFL players.The two-time Pro Bowler admitted to filing unlawful reimbursement claims in the Gene Upshaw NFL Player Health Reimbursement Account Plan.
A top lawyer with Democratic Party ties pleaded not guilty Friday to charges brought by special counsel John Durham, who accused the Perkins Coie attorney of lying to the FBI about whom he was working for when he pushed claims about a secret Trump-Russia back channel in 2016, with Durham saying he hid that he was doing so for the Clinton campaign.
Michael Sussmann, a high-profile D.C. cybersecurity lawyer and DOJ veteran who had previously assisted the Democratic National Committee related to the Russian cyber theft targeting Democratic emails earlier in 2016, appeared in a courtroom at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia late Friday morning.
USA gymnasts describe how FBI lied about their allegations against Larry Nassar
The grand jury indictment against Sussmann centers on a September 2016 meeting between him and then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in which Sussmann, who has worked on behalf of Democratic clients numerous times, passed along allegations claiming there was a secret back channel between Russia’s Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization. While Durham says that Sussmann told Baker he was not working for any specific client, the special counsel contends that Sussmann was actually secretly doing the bidding of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, and billing her campaign for it, as well as working on behalf of a yet-unnamed technology company executive.
DURHAM GRAND JURY INDICTS LAWYER FOR ALLEGEDLY LYING TO FBI, CONCEALING TIES TO CLINTON CAMPAIGN
Trump-appointed counsel said to be seeking to indict Michael Sussmann
John Durham plans to ask a grand jury to indict Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann for making a false statement to the FBI. He alleged Sussmann may have been secretly working for Clinton.Former federal prosecutor Michael Sussmann, 57, who now works as a partner at the Perkins Coie law firm, represented the Democratic National Committee when Russia hacked its servers back in 2016.
“Sussmann lied about the capacity in which he was providing the allegations to the FBI,” the Durham indictment stated. “Specifically, Sussmann stated falsely that he was not doing his work on the aforementioned allegations ‘for any client,’ which led the FBI General Counsel to understand that Sussmann was acting as a good citizen merely passing along information, not as a paid advocate or political operative. In fact … this statement was intentionally false and misleading because, in assembling and conveying these allegations, Sussmann acted on behalf of specific clients, namely, a U.S. technology industry executive at a U.S. internet company, and the Hillary Clinton Presidential Campaign.”
Baker testified in 2018 that Sussman, a former DOJ colleague, shared the Alfa Bank claims with him during a September 2016 meeting. Notes from DOJ official Bruce Ohr’s December 2016 meeting with Glenn Simpson show the Fusion GPS co-founder said the New York Times was wrong to doubt the story that Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization were communicating through secret servers.
Jake Sullivan pushed Alfa Bank claim at center of Durham’s possible indictment
Durham said Sussmann provided Baker with two thumb drives and hard copies of white papers — including one he co-authored, although his name wasn’t on it — along with “eight files containing the Russian Bank Data.”
Immediately after the meeting, Durham said Baker spoke with Bill Priestap, the assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division.
Priestap “took contemporaneous notes” about the Sussmann meeting, including that Sussmann had been “approached by Prominent Cyber People” and had “said not doing this for any client,” according to the indictment. Durham said Sussmann “billed” the FBI meeting to the Clinton campaign with the description of “work and communications regarding confidential project.”
Durham argued Sussmann’s alleged lie was “material” because it “misled” the FBI “concerning the political nature of his work and deprived the FBI of information that might have permitted it more fully to assess and uncover the origins of the relevant data and technical analysis, including the identities and motivations of Sussmann’s clients.”
Clinton lawyer's indictment reveals 'bag of tricks'
The indictment seems to have revealed quite a bit about how scandals are manufactured and manipulated in Washington. From CREEP to Clinton, lawyers discovered themselves in legal jeopardy when special prosecutors found them holding a "bag of tricks." A dirty trick in politics can be a thing of beauty for a campaign - until it boomerangs on the tricksters.Durham's final report, meanwhile, could answer even more questions, but will Washington ever allow it to see the light of day without massive redactions?Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.
Sussmann has denied any wrongdoing.
"Michael Sussmann was indicted today because of politics, not facts," Sussmann attorneys Sean Berkowitz and Michael Bosworth said in a statement obtained by the Washington Examiner on Thursday. "The Special Counsel appears to be using this indictment to advance a conspiracy theory he has chosen not to actually charge. This case represents the opposite of everything the Department of Justice is supposed to stand for. Mr. Sussmann will fight this baseless and politically-inspired prosecution.”
A spokesperson for Perkins Coie said Sussmann "offered his resignation from the firm in order to focus on his legal defense, and the firm accepted it.”
The special counsel said if the FBI had been told the truth, it might have learned that the unnamed tech executive “had exploited his access to non-public data at multiple Internet companies to conduct opposition research concerning Trump” and “enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”
Durham said telling the truth may have also led the FBI to learn that “Sussmann, Tech Executive-1, and Law Firm-1 had coordinated, and were continuing to coordinate, with representatives and agents of the Clinton Campaign with regard to the data and written materials that Sussmann gave to the FBI and the media.”
Barr-Durham investigation again fails to produce a main event
Barr raised hard-to-meet expectations and thereby damaged the investigation itself, not to mention the FBI, Justice Department and nation. And after 28 months of investigating, Durham has produced nothing to show the Trump-Russia probe began improperly.Even the prospects for Sussmann's conviction are uncertain.
In his December 2019 report , DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz said the FBI "concluded by early February 2017 that there were no such links” between Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
So far, Durham has obtained a single guilty plea from ex-FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith for fraudulently editing a FISA filing to state Page was "not a source" for the CIA.
Washington Examiner Videos
Tags:News, John Durham, Russia, Mueller probe, Hillary Clinton
Original Author:Jerry Dunleavy
Original Location:Lawyer accused of lying to FBI about Clinton ties when pushing collusion claims pleads not guilty