TOP News

US: What the fallout from the Supreme Court's Texas abortion ruling means for the future of Roe

The Supreme Court can’t get its story straight on vaccines

  The Supreme Court can’t get its story straight on vaccines The Court is barely even pretending to be engaged in legal reasoning.The first, National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, blocks a Biden administration rule requiring most workers to either get vaccinated against Covid-19 or to routinely be tested for the disease. The second, Biden v. Missouri, backs a more modest policy requiring most health care workers to get the vaccine.

The Supreme Court allowed a Texas law banning abortion past six weeks to remain in effect. Other conservative states may adopt similar measures going forward. (Blair Guild/The Washington Post). “The remaining questions,” she said, “are how and when it falls .” The court ’ s action “set back the hands of time, essentially allowing Texas to be a pre- Roe state,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, president and chief executive of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. If doubts about the future of Roe were one takeaway, the court ’ s brief order contained two other important lessons about the current

The US Supreme Court has heard the most important abortion case in a generation, leaving supporters of abortion rights shaken and opponents hopeful after conservative judges signalled willingness to uphold stiffer restrictions. Mississippi is asking for Roe v Wade to be overturned, and with it the constitutional right to an abortion in the US. If successful, states would be welcome to set their own standards for abortion - including outright bans before foetal viability. Nearly two dozen states are expected to introduce their own bans, some probably more severe than Mississippi' s .

As the Roe v. Wade ruling celebrates its 49th anniversary on Saturday, the vast majority of abortions have been outlawed for nearly five months in the second most populous state in the country.

Demonstrators rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on November 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. © Drew Angerer/Getty Images Demonstrators rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on November 01, 2021 in Washington, DC.

The way the Supreme Court has handled Texas' ban on abortions after six weeks of pregnancy signaled that its Roe precedent -- a landmark abortion rights decision -- does not stand to be fully intact by its 50th anniversary. The fallout from the Texas legal fight has also provided a preview of what abortion access will look like across the country if Roe is dismantled.

Texas abortion ban remains in effect after appeals court ruling

  Texas abortion ban remains in effect after appeals court ruling A federal appeals court rejected a Texas abortion clinics' request to return their challenge against the state's controversial abortion ban, leaving in place the strictest ban in the country.The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily transferred the case to the Republican-controlled Texas Supreme Court in a 2 to 1 decision, according to the Washinton Post, postponing the decision for months. The move will allow the Texas abortion ban, which has led to a large reduction of abortions in the state, to remain in place.The ban restricts access to an abortion after about six weeks into pregnancy, a time when a lot of women do not know they're pregnant yet.

Abortion -rights advocates had asked the Supreme Court to temporarily block the enforcement of the law, which would ban most abortions after as early as six weeks of pregnancy. Their emergency appeal for an injunction was directed to conservative Justice Samuel Alito, who handles requests from the circuit that covers The law took effect after midnight in Texas . A group of abortion providers and advocates including Planned Parenthood filed an emergency request Monday for the Supreme Court to block implementation of the law, but as of Wednesday afternoon the court had yet to weigh in.

The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Texas abortion providers may still sue to stop the ban, but left the law in place in the meantime. Here’ s everything you need to know. Texas banned abortions as early as six weeks, one of the most restrictive measures in the U. S . Many abortion rights advocates believe this means that the Supreme Court , which now has a conservative majority, will reconsider Roe v. Wade. For more on what the future of abortion access looks like, read’ s explainer on new U. S . abortion laws here.

Abortion rights advocates warn that current reality in the Lone Star state may soon be the state-of-play in several other states, if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade in a case from Mississippi that the justices are expected to decide this summer.

Abortion foes cheer the sense they got from the Texas litigation about what the Supreme Court is likely to do in the Mississippi case, which presents a frontal challenge to Roe. In the meantime, Texas has found a way to end access to abortions well before fetal viability, even as court precedent protecting abortion rights up to that point remains for now on the books.

Only 30% of Americans are supportive of reversing Roe v. Wade, according to CNN polling. Abortion rights advocates who have been on the front line of the fight say that even they have been surprised by how quickly the legal tide had shifted against them.

Supreme Court to hear challenge from Sen. Ted Cruz that may undermine campaign finance law

  Supreme Court to hear challenge from Sen. Ted Cruz that may undermine campaign finance law Sen. Cruz, an ex-Supreme Court litigator, is challenging federal campaign finance rules limiting how candidates may loan their campaigns money.A day before his successful reelection in 2018, the Texas Republican loaned his own campaign $260,000. When the deadline came to repay the money, his campaign didn't fully reimburse him, so Cruz could challenge a law that has bitterly divided Republicans and Democrats over how candidates fund their campaigns.

The court held that a woman’ s right to an abortion was implicit in the right to privacy protected by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Prior to Roe v. Wade, abortion had been illegal throughout much of the country since the late 19th century. Roe v. Wade has proved controversial, and Americans remain divided in their support for a woman’ s right to choose an abortion . In the late 1850 s , the newly established American Medical Association began calling for the criminalization of abortion , partly in an effort to eliminate doctors’ competitors such as midwives and homeopaths.

The court ' s conservatives seemed more skeptical about whether to let Democratic President Joe Biden's administration pursue its own challenge. The Justice Department sued Texas in September seeking to block the Republican-backed law. Some justices signaled that existing Supreme Court precedent could accommodate the lawsuit by the abortion providers despite the law's novel design that makes it difficult for federal courts to block it. The law lets private citizens rather than state officials enforce it through lawsuits against providers and others who assist a woman in obtaining an abortion .

"When it affects this many people, we're used to getting some kind of relief from the judicial system," Amy Hagstrom Miller, the president and CEO of the clinic organization Whole Woman's Health, which operates four clinics in Texas.

She said that it was "shocking" that "we may have to look to other branches of government to restore the human rights for pregnant people in this country."

"We can't only go through the district court, circuit court, Supreme Court here anymore," she said.

A more conservative Supreme Court that is treating abortion differently

When the Supreme Court reviewed Texas' six-week abortion ban last year, it was not examining whether to reconsider court precedents that protect access to abortion before the fetus is a viable, a point about 23 weeks into the pregnancy.

Still, the justices' approach provided clues that the court -- which shifted significantly to the right after Trump put three very conservative justices on the bench -- was going to be treating abortion differently than it had in the past.

Activists press companies on abortion with Roe v. Wade at stake

  Activists press companies on abortion with Roe v. Wade at stake Institutional investors with a combined $11.8 billion in assets launched a coordinated effort to pressure The Home Depot Inc. and more than a dozen other companies on the disparity between their public support for women in the workplace and contributions to lawmakers who want to restrict abortion access. Fund managers including the Employees’ Retirement System […] The post Activists press companies on abortion with Roe v. Wade at stake appeared first on Roll Call.

Yesterday, the U. S . Supreme Court again refused to step in to block Texas ’ s blatantly unconstitutional law and vigilante scheme that has ended most abortion access in the state since September. To obtain abortion care, Texans must now drive hundreds of miles to other states, while others without the means to travel are being forced to carry pregnancies against their will. Despite nearly half a century of precedent affirming the constitutional right to abortion , this spring the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the Center’ s case challenging a Mississippi abortion ban that directly challenges Roe v. Wade.

Typically, abortion clinics have been able to obtain preliminary orders that block restrictive abortion laws even before they go into effect. But, when clinics sought such relief in the Texas case, the Supreme Court's conservatives declined to give it to them, citing the Texas law's unique design.

Texas is enforcing its six-week ban, known as SB8, by letting private citizens sue in state court abortion clinics or anyone else who facilitates an abortion after fetal cardiac activity is detected, which is around six weeks into the pregnancy. Clinics say that the threat of those lawsuits is having a chilling effect that has spooked them from offering the procedure.

Abortion opponents took it as a major sign of where the Supreme Court was headed in Roe that the justices rejected the request by clinics that it take extraordinary actions to block the Texas law.

"To finally say, 'We're not creating new exceptions that are not in the law for abortion,' was huge," said Roger Severino a conservative lawyer who served in a top role in the Trump administration's Department of Health and Human Services.

Nation's largest abortion protest could be last under Roe

  Nation's largest abortion protest could be last under Roe AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The largest anti-abortion rally in the U.S. returns Friday with thousands of expected protesters in Washington who feel within reach of their goal for the last 49 years: a sweeping rollback of abortion rights. “My hopes have been dashed many times, but I have never felt like this,” said Joe Pojman, executive director of Texas Alliance for Life. The March for Life, for decades an annual protest against abortion, arrives this year as the Supreme Court has indicated it will allow states to impose tighter restrictions on abortion with a ruling in the coming months — and possibly overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v.

Regardless of what the justices do in the Dobbs case, the validation of how Texas modeled its ban is going to shape the legislation anti-abortion activists seek to pass in other states.

"This is not an episodic victory. This is really important for the movement," said Texas Right to Life legislative director John Seago, who said that lawmakers in a half dozen states are considering passing their own versions of SB8. "It shows that it works, that the industry is concerned about lawsuits, private lawsuits, even though they're difficult to bring. And that's going to be needed in the future, even if the state has criminal penalties on the procedure on the books."

For abortion rights advocates, the decision in the Texas case made it all too clear how drastically the Supreme Court had changed since a 2016 decision -- when Justices Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Bader Ginsburg were still on the court -- that gave clinics a resounding win against another Texas abortion law that took a much narrower approach to scaling back access.

"They could care less about the health and safety outcomes of women and families," said Amy Hagstrom Miller, the president and CEO of the clinic organization Whole Woman's Health, which brought challenges both to SB8 and the Texas anti-abortion law struck down in 2016.

Now-Deleted Tweet From Senator Thom Tillis Confuses His Stance on Protecting the 'Unborn'

  Now-Deleted Tweet From Senator Thom Tillis Confuses His Stance on Protecting the 'Unborn' "I will continue my work in the Senate to end innocent, unborn lives," the anti-abortion senator wrote in his tweet."Each of us has a duty to protect the most vulnerable among us, even those who are not yet born," Tillis' tweet, published on Friday afternoon, began.

With the exception of Justice Sonia Sotomayer's dissent, Miller said of the recent six-week ban ruling, "It wasn't even brought up that people's human rights are at stake here."

"It was just all about the sort of legal back and forth, and the legal strategy," she said.

How a narrow win was more like a loss

The legal fight over the Texas' law hasn't ended, and clinics say they're going to press their case even as the Supreme Court several handicapped their ability to do so. They're still committed to providing abortions before the six-week mark. But women past that point are being forced to either carry their unwanted pregnancy to term, travel out of state -- where the surge of Texas patients is causing longer waits for anyone seeking an abortion -- or try to end their pregnancies on their own.

"The same amount of people need access to safe abortion as they did before SB8," Miller said. "SB8 just blocks highly trained medical professionals like us from being able to provide that care."

When the Supreme Court issued its opinion last month, abortion seekers in Oklahoma face four-week waits for appointees, while those in Louisiana's faced waits as long as six weeks, according to providers.

The Texas case has shown how new legal complications can be introduced in the court battles over access.

The Supreme Court left the door open for abortion clinics to continue their lawsuit against a few state licensing officials who in theory could revoke the licenses of physicians for performing the outlawed abortions.

Biden says Roe v. Wade under attack like 'never before'

  Biden says Roe v. Wade under attack like 'never before' President Biden and Vice President Harris released a statement Saturday commemorating the 49th anniversary of the landmark decision Roe v. Wade, which gave women the constitutional right to abortion. The Biden-Harris administration said that the decision is under attack like "never before" amid several states' attempts to pass restrictions on the practice. "The constitutional right established in Roe v. Wade nearly 50 years ago today is under assault as never before. It is a right we believe should be codified into law, and we pledge to defend it with every tool we possess," Biden and Harris said in a statement.

"In many ways, the Supreme Court's opinion is actually the worst of all worlds for us, because now the Supreme Court has ruled that abortion providers' medical licenses and nursing licenses and abortion facility licenses are all at stake if ... anyone violates SB8," said Marc Hearron, senior counsel for the Center for Reproductive Rights, which is representing the clinics in the case.

Their attempts to at least advance their lawsuit against those officials have gained little traction since the Supreme Court's decision. The case went to the 5th Circuit US Court of Appeals which said earlier this week that the US Supreme Court's language was not definitive with regards to those licensing officials. So the federal appellate court is now asking the Texas Supreme Court -- made up of entirely Republican justices -- to weigh in as well, a process that could take several weeks or months. The Supreme Court -- over the fiery public dissent of the three liberal justices -- rejected on Thursday a clinic request that it intervene in the lower court's handling of the case.

In an earlier hearing before the 5th Circuit sent the case to the Texas Supreme Court, two of the appellate panel's members made comments indicating that they didn't see any urgency in allowing clinics to seek the relief they're now requesting.

Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan questioned what use the clinics would get out of their lawsuit against the licensing officials, given that the chilling effect of the private enforcement lawsuits would remain. Circuit Judge Edith Jones wondered whether the court should just sit on their case until the Supreme Court decided the Mississippi lawsuit, which concern the state's 15-week abortion ban.

Jones' comment was "shocking," according to University of Texas-Austin health law professor Elizabeth Sepper, particularly given that the Supreme Court had sped up its move to send the case back to the 5th Circuit after its ruling.

"But in some sense, Judge Jones said what everyone is thinking: if Dobbs overrules Roe v. Wade, then the issue of SB8 is just dead in the water, at least in terms of the constitutional right to abortion," Sepper said.

Breyer retirement throws curveball into midterms .
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer's upcoming retirement is throwing a curveball into both parties' midterm plans, injecting a highly partisan issue into an already combustible election cycle.Supreme Court nominations have been the subjects of some of the most bitter fights between Democrats and Republicans in recent years, and Democrats are still smarting from the battles over former President Trump's three conservative additions to the bench.

See also